Skip to content
How ADscan compares

ADscan is not a generalist platform. It is the Active Directory specialist.

Here is exactly where it wins, and where it does not. The honest version, because certainty is built on what we will admit, not on what we claim.

The comparison

ADscan against the three things a CISO actually considers.

ADscan against the three things a CISO actually considers.
DimensionADscanAnnual pentestGeneric BASBloodHound Enterprise
ScopeActive Directory only, deepEverything, one dayWeb / AD / lateral / cloudAD / identity only
Proves paths by exploitingYes, exploitsYes, manual, one dayYes, diluted in ADNo, maps only
Open-source engineYes, 300+ stars on GitHubNot applicableNo, black boxYes, BloodHound CE
Native DORA / NIS2 / ENS mappingYesNoNoNo
Deployment / data residencyOn-prem, AD data never leavesExternal consultantSaaS-firstSaaS / managed
ContinuityContinuous, 365 daysAnnual, a photoContinuousContinuous
Pricing transparencyTransparent, free PoVPer engagementOpaque, book a demoGet a demo
Entry / first valueReal free report, no sales demoScoping then invoiceSales demo / contractSales demo / contract

Filled node = a deliberate strength. Ring = genuinely covered. Half = covered but shallow or conditional. Dash = not covered.

Where each tool is genuinely strong

We will not pretend the alternatives are weak. They are not.

ADscan goes deep on one surface. That is a choice, not a universal advantage. If you read only the table you would miss what these tools do better, so here it is, plainly.

Annual pentest / consultancy

A skilled human reasons about your business, chains findings creatively across surfaces no automated tool reaches, and writes context an engine cannot. Once a year, on everything, by someone who understands your organization.

Generic BAS — Pentera, Picus, Cymulate

They cover far more surface than ADscan: web, lateral movement, external, cloud. They are more mature as products, carry more brand trust with boards, and have more public proof. If your risk is spread across many surfaces, this breadth is real.

BloodHound Enterprise

It is excellent at mapping identity attack paths and showing the choke points that, once fixed, collapse many paths at once. As a continuous identity-graph product, it is a category leader. ADscan exploits where BHE maps; both views have value.

When to choose ADscan, and when not to

The honest fit test.

ADscan is the right call if
  • You are a regulated entity under DORA, NIS2 or ENS
  • Active Directory is your critical, ransomware-bearing surface
  • You want continuous exposure validation mapped to compliance
  • Your budget is outside the Pentera range
  • You value an open-source engine and on-premise data residency
ADscan is not the call if
  • You need cloud, web or external-surface validation, ADscan is AD-only on purpose
  • You already run an enterprise BAS suite that serves you well
  • Your critical risk lives outside identity and Active Directory
The one proof point we stand on
In the 6 regulated entities where I ran it, 100% had at least one path to full domain takeover. One had gone undetected through two years of annual pentests.
Yeray Martín, founder, senior penetration tester
> 95%of environments have attack paths, the gap a pentest photo misses
The honest next step

Do not take the table on faith. See it on your own AD.

A free proof of value, run by the founder on your real Active Directory, mapped to DORA, NIS2 and ENS, delivered the same day.

ADscan vs Pentera, BAS and annual pentest — Active Directory exposure compared | ADscan